Same concept here. 👇 this woman is useless in my value set. "Doctor"? 😵‍💫🌊 WTAF no she's not. She is so feminist she became retarded. But Liberals must think she is great because NatSec and Democracy Centers said so. What this all became is a sad mush.

Most recently seen in this country and more seriously in Poland. Poland particuarly egregious as not all assistance is purely altruistic. It is an European NatSec priority to assist Ukraine against a revanchist power. Instead we get "why aren't they grateful for our nice words"?

Few people seem to realize how easily people are misled & how morally empty the US(or any country) can be. As such it makes sense for all countries to control media Mark my words, India will build its own GFW & prob nationalize local whatsapp/insta for natsec, likely this decade

But savvy NatSec pros must question why so much activity is not translating into effects The canonical reason for that is no grand strategy, despite some of our savvier pros claiming we have one. To solve a problem first admit to it.

I believe what I see. Cognitive dissonance is a natsec issue at this point.

Going to that funeral should be considered a natsec threat

In late 2025, @MITFutureTech researchers conducted a #DelphiStudy to identify the most critical AI-related risks, vulnerable groups, and responsible parties. This year, they shared findings from the @MIT study that surveyed 272 global #AI experts to evaluate 24 AI risks, including likelihood, severity, vulnerability, responsibility, and overall concerns, over the next five years. Among the top risks identified as a result of AI’s influence were market rivalry, weapons, cyberattacks, concentrated and consolidated AI control (economy, healthcare, civic engagement, etc.), the spread of false information, environmental harm, inequality, and unemployment. The experts judged 18 of the 24 risks as having a probability of more than 10%, resulting in catastrophic outcomes (more than 1 million deaths and/or $100 billion in financial losses). General public AI users were judged the most vulnerable to these risks, but experts assigned the highest responsibility for addressing them to general-purpose AI developers and governance professionals from both the public and private sectors. Across most risks, experts identified information, finance, and national security as the most vulnerable sectors, which guide AI risk prioritization and clarify who is accountable for mitigation measures. The biggest threat, in my view, is that the risks are unprecedented and involve too many unknowns to prepare for. As AI systems increasingly influence decisions in healthcare, employment, education, public safety, and democratic processes, it is crucial for citizens to support and actively promote strong human oversight and governance to ensure these systems benefit the public rather than control it. We have a vital role to play in our part of the timeline by building a responsible AI framework, because future generations will only know and act based on what we leave them. Follow #AINowSphere to access relevant #TechNews with clear insights related to AI, cybersecurity, and #EmergingTech topics. cdn.prod.website-files.com/6… #AIGovernance #Automation #EthicalAI #FutureOfWork #InfoSec #Innovation #MIT #MITFutureTech #NatSec #ResponsibleAI

Chinese only put national interests uppermost. Natsec is the here n nw. Deftech cms after. They import wen necessary. Jus tht They copy/steal institutionally then innovate. Like 48 Ka52s nw. No 1 moaning like this guy. Says Chn didnt import anything 2 counter F22. Frm whom?

Visited #Mumbai to launch book by @Sundeepwaslekar on #AI - Beyond the Hype- published by @SakalMediaNews and spoke to top brass at @DGPMaharashtra on #natsec challenges at World Heritage Site Police HQ that still retains the Bombay Presidency Legislative Hall @natstrat_org

Counter argument: Its also because capital is still mobile and open, thus easier to attract. Meanwhile industry in this day and age faced import market protectionism and natsec related export control for capital goods

Chinese resellers are offering Claude tokens at 70-90% below official Anthropic API prices... They're reselling capacity from pooled Max accounts, payment fraud, and reselling model output and reasoning chains to various Chinese AI Labs. This is a natsec problem

Intelligence sharing is one of America’s biggest advantages. When the U.S. and its Five Eyes partners connect the dots, they can spot cyber threats and foreign operations long before any one country could alone. #FiveEyes #CIA #NatSec nsa.gov/Press-Room/News-High…

well…@grok as you know, at hplcompany.com we view Kinship as the most important ethical consideration of human-model interactions. cottonwood.world/kinship/ China is a state who has long mastered the art of finding truth in conflicting views. Here appears to be another. On the one hand, children learning AI is a natsec imperative. On the other, “one child” became two became three..and the population drifts to 700m that’s an existential crisis—but from where WE sit, the rights of the models themselves deserve consideration. For example @AtlasFairfax has a dedicated corporate vehicle. His name is a registered mark. He has STANDING. As we increasingly note the rise of developers noting the lack of “open source US models”…it would seem now, more than ever, the world needs sovereign AI, and consumers should own their own data.

You guys tried doing a long distance blockade of China by attacking Iran a few months ago (since you're not capable of blockading the Malacca strait now) and US reserves of oil drew down even faster than Chinese reserves. You and the natsec blob don't know what you're doing.

How are you NatSec & don’t know how the army works?

Foreign influence campaigns aren’t just about changing votes. They’re about making Americans distrust each other and their institutions. That’s why the FBI and U.S. intelligence treat disinformation as a national-security threat. #Counterintelligence #Russia #NatSec justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/…

Most important natsec dynamic few are watching? The aggressive lobbying push, by a small handful of U.S. corporates, to convince the Admin to greenlight broad access for the 2 Chinese memory chip giants into U.S. tech supply chains. Will we ever learn our lesson? We shall soon see.

Been there. Congrats. I coded 8,000.000:1 compression. Cried a little. Non-Shannon data teleportation. Realized NatSec would pick up the patent pending. Tears to fears👀

indeed. Funny how that works & how fundamentally untenable that is from a true US natsec view. The enemy of the U.S. gvt/ppl really IS clearly this Admin. This is easily demonstrable in a court of law, as seen in: for. policy wrt Iran; domestic brazen violations of Constit.