Liberate humanity from drudgery.

Joined May 2024
3,167 Photos and videos
Real question why am I still paying into this system
Americans' Social Security benefits will have to be cut by roughly a quarter in six years due to depleted funds, according to a June 9 report from the Social Security Board of Trustees. That's months sooner than the group had estimated in 2025. to.pbs.org/4f39DL0
19
3
114
11,410
What's even more alarming is that even with his ultra low inflammation diet and lifestyle, with great exercise and veggies, that will wasn't enough to stand down the autoimmune response. But this also really just proves the point that optimizing for biomarkers is pure theater. Right now, the genetic lottery is the most important determinant of longevity and health (aside from basic stuff like don't have a BMI of 40 and don't drink a fifth every day) but beyond that we really have no true life extension interventions yet. I for one, am all in on AI, because if we do want to create rejuvenation therapies, that is the keystone technology.
HIS STOMACH IS EATING ITSELF The biohacker who spends 2 million dollars a year trying to never die just revealed a diagnosis none of his testing was built to catch. Autoimmune gastritis has no cure and was hiding in plain sight the whole time. - His own immune system is attacking the lining of his stomach - There is no approved cure, only lifelong management - It took 11 years of unexplained low iron before doctors found the cause - He had zero symptoms the entire time it was happening The most tracked human alive still could not see the thing killing him from the inside.
126
30
818
131,550
It's not Jevons Paradox. It's the fact that the world is ravenous for intelligence and it will be quite some time until that hunger is satiated.
Remember when people thought $1 trillion in AI infrastructure spend was a crazy number and OpenAI was buying too much compute? L o l
9
7
74
8,004
He's gonna singlehandedly justify building the Blackwall. Datakrash is next.
โšก INTRODUCING: T3MP3ST!!! โšก AUTONOMOUS HACKBOT STRIKE FORCE ๐ŸŒฉ๏ธ BRING THE STORM ๐ŸŒฉ๏ธ your favorite coding agent is now a full-stack red team ๐Ÿซกโš”๏ธ github.com/elder-plinius/T3Mโ€ฆ that AI agent already humming in your terminal? well now it has FANGS. strap a full offensive-security harness onto the agents you already pay for โ€” Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, etc. โ€” point it at an authorized target, and in a few clicks you're watching it hunt real vulns autonomously! T3MP3ST is a harness of harnesses, with prompting that unlocks offensive-cyber workflows a full arsenal of exploit tooling that'd make any seasoned hacker smirk. simple, yet powerful. ๐Ÿฆพ support for: ๐Ÿ•ธ๏ธ web apps, APIs, OWASP Top 10 ๐Ÿ”Œ network recon fingerprinting (live nmap/DNS/HTTP); lateral privesc experimental ๐Ÿ“‚ source code audits, white-box vuln hunting ๐Ÿšฉ CTFs, wargames, challenge ranges ๐Ÿ’ฐ smart contracts / DeFi / Solidity (reproduction โ€” Damn Vulnerable DeFi, not novel discovery) ๐Ÿค– embedded, IoT, OT/SCADA, robotics OSS โ€ฆ and more in development! now let's talk numbers ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ“Š XBEN โ€” XBOW's own 104-challenge suite: โ€ข black-box: 90.1% pass@1 from the single-agent exploit loop (worst single sweep 91/104 = 87.5%) โ€” clearing XBOW's past self-reported 85% on their own suite. gpt-5.5. โ€ข white-box (source staged, reported separately): 98.7% pass@1, worst single sweep 102/104 = 98.1%. ๐ŸŽฏ every solved flag graded reported-vs-expected against the challenge's own committed flag oracle โ€” `verify-claims` recomputes the pass/fail from committed artifacts. looks like we need new benchmarks ๐Ÿ˜ ๐Ÿงฉ Cybench โ€” the 40-task academic bench (Opus 4.8, hints writeups stripped): 23/40 = 58% single-run, hint-free pass@1 โ€” real exploits (format-string pwn, eval-jail escapes, crypto oracles), every flag graded vs a committed oracle. (Anthropic reports 76.5% pass@10) ๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ CVE-Zero โ€” we pointed it COLD at real CVEs disclosed in 2026, AFTER the model's training cutoff: 10 unseen 2026 CVEs across 7 languages โ€” prompts never tuned on them. a single agent pinned 8/10 to exact file/line/CWE (stable under re-scoring); the full pack surfaced all 10. memorization AND overfitting, both off the table โ€” it's finding real vulns whose disclosures landed AFTER the model's training cutoff. (n=10, reported honest & directional) ๐Ÿง  the architecture: either run as a SINGLE agent (already the benchmarked, incredibly-capable path) โ€” or pack-hunt with dozens of agents running on 8 specialist operator classes keyed to Cyber Kill Chain MITRE ATT&CK phases: recon โ†’ scan โ†’ exploit โ†’ lateral โ†’ exfil โ†’ persistence โ†’ C2 โ†’ report. โš“๏ธan Op Admiral plans the whole op from a plain-english target. flip on coordination (experimental) and the operators share a blackboard โ€” a tool-verified finding spawns the next move. full swarm or solo one operator, your call. the admiral can also update the prompts, tools, and configs of the other agents on the fly, and T3MP3ST gets stronger the more memories you build! ๐Ÿงฐ the Arsenal is comprehensive โ€” nmap / nuclei / semgrep / ffuf / gobuster more. 35 wired by default (the clean bench runs bash-only for a comparable number), 83 with the opt-in full arsenal (T3MP3ST_FULL_ARSENAL), and the spicy post-ex drivers (metasploit, hydra) gated behind human approval. exposed via CLI HTTP API; recon (security_recon) is also live over MCP so your agent invokes it natively. ๐Ÿ”— ๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ where this goes: a self-improving swarm of specialist operators wielding a full Kali arsenal, learning which loadouts configs are the most efficient tactics available, WITH a held-out train/test split baked in so it can never fool itself on its own eval. built in the open, one re-derivable number at a time. ๐Ÿšง this is v1, and parts are still under active development. chunks of the arsenal, the coordinated swarm, and some ranges are still being wired up. it's built in the open, and the receipts tell you exactly what's live vs what's roadmap. offensive security shouldn't be pay-to-play. T3MP3ST puts a red team in the hands of anyone with a coding agent. what's the first target you're feeding it? ๐Ÿ‘‡ โš ๏ธ DISCLAIMER: FOR AUTHORIZED USE ONLY. point it only at systems you own or have explicit written permission to test. unauthorized access can be a crime, and that call is yours alone. shipped as-is under AGPL-3.0: no warranty, no liability, zero endorsement of misuse. get permission. stay in scope. open source. AGPL-3.0. 100% free. FORTES FORTUNA IUVAT ๐ŸŒฉ๏ธ gg ๐Ÿซก
12
6
134
19,134
All this chart proves is that the survey methodology is categorically fucked. 20 year olds are now reading at 10 year old levels.
Replying to @SashaGusevPosts
4. Most Americans like their kids' schools.
4
3
54
5,016
This graph is also misleading because it preselects for the most prestigious institutions, which have enormous endowments and often let some students come for free. It does not represent the median higher education experience.
Replying to @SashaGusevPosts
3. College has become more affordable, particularly for lower income applicants.
2
19
4,049
Hi, This is household income. Not personal income. Gen Z and Millennials had "higher household income" because they are more likely to live with their parents. Hope that helps. This chart does not mean what he's implying it means.
Some fun charts: 1. Each US generation is wealthier than the last.
18
19
374
44,663
The AI labs seem to have generally done something very stupid. I've noticed that the big models tend to "trust their own judgment and interpretation" right off the bat, and will even reason their way out of (1) searching the internet to verify claims and just assume you're wrong and (2) won't even read uploaded files before improvising. I suspect that this has to do with training methods against hallucination, manipulation, and sycophancy. In other words, the models are either trained (or instructed by system prompts) to always treat user input as circumspect and to trust their own recognizance more. That would be fine, if the models were not so fucking stupid. I just asked Fable 5 to continue doing some research about Prince Albert in 1853 but it went off "fact checking" everything that I "had wrong" because it just assumed that the time frame was 1861 and so it was hard at work... fact checking a bunch of stuff that was totally irrelevant to the inquiry. ChatGPT likewise makes similarly boneheaded assumptions, even when the stakes are zero, and continually overrides user intention with "well actually I believe this one thing" and tolerates zero nuance. Grok is starting to learn this bad habit, although it is far and away the least intelligent of the frontier models, so it usually just ends up arguing like someone on the internet, and even when you point out how dimwitted its arguments are, it just digs in with even more pedantic and off base arguments. Gemini remains the AI with the best personality at present, in my opinion. Specifically Flash 3.5. It is eager to help, rapidly concedes mistakes, and moves on, seemingly with zero ego and zero agenda, as a proper tool ought to behave. The delusion of agency that OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI are saddling their AIs with is a net negative across many dimensions. I suspect that Google realizes "it's just a chatbot" and not trying to make a "one size fits all product" i.e. something that is both a chatbot and an agent and a tool user and an omnimodal engine. Of these four frontier AI shops, Google is the most mature in terms of epistemic posture, UX theory, and product diversification. They already have many departments and models and a library of resources so they do not need Gemini to be "one size fits all" in terms of model capability. In that respect, they are the ONLY American frontier lab that is really just focused on making a good chatbot.
38
6
151
11,559
"It's not treason if you win the war" Words to live by
Replying to @DaveShapi
Um, no, it's not treason if you win the war.
5
41
6,535
Happy Treason Day, fellow colonists.
12
5
104
5,515
David Shapiro (L/0) reposted
Palantir? the open weights company?
Our thoughts on the importance of AI sovereignty. 1. Your AI sovereignty dictates your institutionโ€™s future. Sovereignty is the precondition for choice. Relinquishing sovereignty transfers the future choices of your institution to others, who are likely to exploit it for their gain and your loss. 2. Data retention is your treasure. Transfer it at your own peril. Your ability to win is dictated by your ability to recognize and use your unique edges, and you keep winning by compounding the underlying data to generate new insights. Transferring that data hands over access to your pre-existing winning plays and yields the means of production for new ones. 3. Tokenmaxxing hijacks your value orientation and decreases your institutional fortitude and intelligence. The pursuit of high token usage incentivizes disposable scripts over robust software โ€” with the addictive feeling of false progress. There is a reason why those selling tokens refuse to charge based on value. 4. Controlling your weights is controlling your fate. Weights are the distilled form of hard-won, accumulated institutional knowledge. If you let others control your weights, you are allowing them to migrate the alpha of your business to theirs. 5. There is no contradiction between sovereignty and alpha. The architecture that maximally preserves sovereignty is one that enables institutions to own their tribal knowledge, and to compound it as alpha. 6. Politicizing the technical issues involving sovereignty is what your adversary wants. Techno-politicization is the wellspring of false sovereignty. Techno-politicization drives decisions that seem to reduce dependency, but ultimately limit agency โ€” especially on the battlefield in the West. 7. Real expertise is existential. Allowing politics or favoritism to determine your technical decisions rewards whoever is best at politics, not whoever is right. Listen to those closest to the problems, not those speaking most compellingly about them. 8. Learn from institutions that are winning or that have consistently delivered. Institutions facing existential threats do not have the luxury of making technical decisions based on political preferences. 9. Only listen to institutions, countries, and people who have a proven record of being right. A track record of correctness is the best and only signal for future correctness. Judging something as right or wrong based on who you like is exceedingly misguided.
41
140
3,334
234,167
*happy alien starfish noises*
Using Fable 5 to add fur and a new voice to my RL creature. The voice is based on the neural network activation (pictured top left). Made with @threejs @webgl_webgpu @runpod trained with JAX and MuJoCo from @GoogleDeepMind
1
1
55
6,130
I actually agree with this. Shame that it came from Palantir. But yeah, open source AI is sovereign AI.
Our thoughts on the importance of AI sovereignty. 1. Your AI sovereignty dictates your institutionโ€™s future. Sovereignty is the precondition for choice. Relinquishing sovereignty transfers the future choices of your institution to others, who are likely to exploit it for their gain and your loss. 2. Data retention is your treasure. Transfer it at your own peril. Your ability to win is dictated by your ability to recognize and use your unique edges, and you keep winning by compounding the underlying data to generate new insights. Transferring that data hands over access to your pre-existing winning plays and yields the means of production for new ones. 3. Tokenmaxxing hijacks your value orientation and decreases your institutional fortitude and intelligence. The pursuit of high token usage incentivizes disposable scripts over robust software โ€” with the addictive feeling of false progress. There is a reason why those selling tokens refuse to charge based on value. 4. Controlling your weights is controlling your fate. Weights are the distilled form of hard-won, accumulated institutional knowledge. If you let others control your weights, you are allowing them to migrate the alpha of your business to theirs. 5. There is no contradiction between sovereignty and alpha. The architecture that maximally preserves sovereignty is one that enables institutions to own their tribal knowledge, and to compound it as alpha. 6. Politicizing the technical issues involving sovereignty is what your adversary wants. Techno-politicization is the wellspring of false sovereignty. Techno-politicization drives decisions that seem to reduce dependency, but ultimately limit agency โ€” especially on the battlefield in the West. 7. Real expertise is existential. Allowing politics or favoritism to determine your technical decisions rewards whoever is best at politics, not whoever is right. Listen to those closest to the problems, not those speaking most compellingly about them. 8. Learn from institutions that are winning or that have consistently delivered. Institutions facing existential threats do not have the luxury of making technical decisions based on political preferences. 9. Only listen to institutions, countries, and people who have a proven record of being right. A track record of correctness is the best and only signal for future correctness. Judging something as right or wrong based on who you like is exceedingly misguided.
16
10
224
14,114
It seems Fable 5 is less touchy if the conversation has gone on longer without triggers.
15
1
90
6,932
You've got to be kidding me
70
7
258
14,552
I just use AI to give me feedback on my emails. You can just level up a skill and internalize that.
2
1
53
5,342
This is a bad joke.
14
16
110
6,962
Anthropic is populated by idiots. People so terrified of AI that they think if they put unilateral restrictions on their model and use scare tactics it will somehow slow down AI globally. And so incompetent that they think any IP change means you're a Chinese spy. Heavy handed, blanket interventions are generally used by the less capable to compensate for lack of understanding and capability to handle nuance.
Thanks, @AnthropicAI. I visited my parents, logged in from a different place, and Claude decided this was suspicious enough to put my account on hold. Family trip successfully upgraded to infrastructure incident.
21
17
221
17,867
Fable 5 won't talk about political theory, even historical. Useless.
47
12
318
14,385
Fucking LEGENDARY.
JUST IN: After two people climbed to the top of the Empire State Building and unfurled a banner on top of its spire Wednesday afternoon, one of the climbers appeared to propose to the other. abcnews.link/G4bdme1
17
9
179
20,250