SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is the next wave of AI biology simulations not experimental perturbation data?
We asked
@Ronalfa, co-founder and CEO of
@NOETIK_ai
"Our view is the last wave of AI bio was, okay, we're gonna generate a whole bunch of data in the lab, experimental perturbation data, and then train models on that. This next wave is actually gonna be more simulations."
"From the very beginning we've been focused on the concept of world models. Can we actually just simulate the perturbations? Because if you want to work with the data that's most relevant, which is the human data, you can't really perturb it."
"Historically, people have tried to come up with virtual cell models as, okay, if we can just simulate everything, all the chemical reactions in the cell, think of the cell as just a bag of chemical reactions, and if we have a model that could simulate everything, you can fully understand the biology of the cell. My view is, that's gonna be really hard. I don't even think we could generate that level of data."
"When we think of a virtual cell, we're literally just trying to simulate some biology of a cell in a patient tumor. Placing cells in that patient tumor in the simulation."
"I don't really want to get to all the chemical reactions. I just want to know what genes are gonna be good drug targets for cancers, and can we understand patients that respond to certain drugs and patients that don't based on these simulations."