America First should be our one and only priority at this point yet we have so many others.
Tolerance and Allowance aren't virtues.
Silence or inaction when you see things that go against American Values aren't virtues and they are what got us here today.
Historically who has benefited no matter the Party, Ideology, or ruling Power? "Elites" especially mega corporation technology Elites. They play within all sides very well. They are masters of the Chess board.
Right now they are selling you that the only way to fix it is all is a system that can be turned into a total track, trace, surveillance, control grid and even a "pre-crime" system that targets whoever the system says are extremists or threats at any given point moving forward.
Meanwhile Rome is allowing Bishops to be consecrated by the Chinese Communist Party and doing others things that seem against their own doctrines and teaching and have done this for a very long time.
Christians are being divided and many of the Religious heads that surround President Trump seem to put Israel first very often over their own nation or over their own Christian beliefs.
Mass migration policies that were supported by UN, NATO, WHO, WEF, Open Society Foundation, The Previous U.S. Administrations, and even Israel (as long as not in their own nation) has flooded Western civilization including America with foreign nationals with beliefs that go directly against everything America stands for. Largely Islam but also Communists, Marxists, and more.
Even as far back as Operation Paperclip in 1945 we infused our nation with ideologies brought over by the 1,600 Nazis and Japanese that many of which committed grave atrocities against humanity prior to bringing them into our entire government and societal system.
All the things established after WWII to include the United Nations, NATO, and the World Health Organization along with UNESCO have done massive harms to the United States from within especially in our Education and Health Systems. They removed God from both and then removed history and core principles of America from both. United Nations 2030 Agenda is a great talking point but in the end it just means to me that they want America to fall along with its annoying ethos and principles so they can keep moving forward.
So lets talk the Betrayal or at a minimum the willful actions of our Mega Corporations and Government that have only became "Elites" thanks to the American people through selling their products or in the governments case a lot of massive theft. Theft of Trillions. The People (taxes that the government controls) is used by the government to advance technologies under private companies. The private companies monetize those technologies and get very rich with no real return to the American people on their investment.
Lets talk some history:
The Global Mirror (1948–2026)
The surveillance and dual-use capabilities documented in earlier chapters are not uniquely American. They have analogues — often more mature and less constrained — in states that American capital, manufacturing, and technology helped build. This chapter traces that pattern across China, Israel, Southeast Asia, the strategic frontier, and the Gulf: the documented arc by which the United States, its corporations, and its capital markets contributed to building the industrial, technological, and surveillance capacities of other powers, and the ways those capacities now mirror, exceed, or constrain American ones. The central observation is structural and, importantly, largely emergent. As the source material itself frames it, no villain’s monologue is required: these systems were built openly, by ordinary actors pursuing ordinary incentives. That emergent reading, not a thesis of coordinated design, is what the evidence best supports.
The China Mirror
The Manufacturing and Capital Migration
Beginning with Nixon’s 1972 opening and accelerating after Deng Xiaoping’s 1978 reforms, American manufacturing and capital migrated to China on a historic scale. The joint-venture requirement functioned as a structural technology-transfer mechanism; the 1980s saw apparel, electronics, and automotive production relocate, and the 1990s–2000s saw core industrial capacity follow. China’s 2001 WTO accession on favorable terms accelerated what economists Autor, Dorn, and Hanson later quantified as the “China Shock” — over two million American manufacturing jobs lost to import competition between 1999 and 2011. American technology firms seeded Chinese capability directly: Microsoft Research Asia (founded 1998) trained a generation of Chinese computer scientists, American venture capital funded Chinese technology and AI firms, and American semiconductors supplied the computing substrate.
Sources: Autor, David, David Dorn, and Gordon Hanson, “The China Shock” papers, 2013 onward. Mann, James. Beijing Jeep, 1989.
The Surveillance Architecture
That capability matured into one of the most extensive surveillance systems ever built, and its components are documented in detail. The Golden Shield Project, launched by the Ministry of Public Security in 1998, modernized police information systems and built the “Great Firewall” controlling the Chinese internet — running, under the hood, on Cisco hardware and Oracle database technology. The Skynet urban camera network, begun around 2005, grew to hundreds of millions of cameras (state media claimed roughly 200 million by 2018; analyst estimates ranged higher), supplemented by the rural “Sharp Eyes” program from 2015. Two firms — Hikvision (majority-controlled by the state defense-electronics conglomerate CETC) and Dahua — came to dominate global surveillance-camera manufacturing, supplying not only China but, until U.S. procurement bans in 2018–2019, American military bases and police departments. Both were added to the U.S. Entity List in 2019 for their role in Xinjiang.
The distinguishing feature is the AI fusion layer: population-scale facial recognition from firms such as SenseTime, Megvii, and Yitu; gait recognition (Watrix); voice-print databases (iFlytek); and predictive-policing systems such as the Integrated Joint Operations Platform (IJOP) in Xinjiang, documented by Human Rights Watch in 2019, which ingested checkpoint, banking, communications, and utility data to generate flags for investigation. In Xinjiang this stack enabled the detention of perhaps a million or more Uyghurs from 2017, with biometric collection (face, iris, DNA, voice) conducted under the guise of “free health checks” — using, until public pressure forced restrictions in 2019, DNA-sequencing equipment from the American firm Thermo Fisher Scientific.
DOCUMENTED: China’s surveillance stack and American contributions to it
The Golden Shield, Skynet, Sharp Eyes, the Hikvision/Dahua industrial base, the AI-vision firms, the IJOP, the Xinjiang detention system, and the documented Western technology inputs (Cisco, Oracle, Thermo Fisher, Nvidia/Intel, American university collaborations) are documented in government action, the Xinjiang Police Files (2022), Human Rights Watch reporting, and the 2022 UN human-rights report. The 2019 Entity List additions and 2018–2019 U.S. procurement bans are documented. These facts are established.
How Control Actually Operates
A common Western mischaracterization deserves correction at the outset: there is no single unified “social credit score” assigned to every Chinese citizen. The reality is both more fragmented and, in some respects, more pervasive — a layered architecture of identification, monitoring, financial conditioning, and graduated punishment. Real-name identification ties a national ID number to every SIM card, internet account, train and plane ticket, hotel stay, bank account, and payment app. A camera-and-biometric mesh provides continuous identification in public space. The financial layer — Alipay and WeChat Pay, with cash use collapsed in urban China — identifies, timestamps, and locates virtually every transaction, with the digital yuan (e-CNY) adding a sovereign channel technically capable of programmable, conditional money. The most consequential punishment mechanism is not a universal score but the Supreme People’s Court’s blacklist of “dishonest persons,” which since 2013 has automatically barred listed individuals (reaching more than seven million at peak) from plane and high-speed-rail tickets, better hotels, property and vehicle purchase, and senior positions.
DOCUMENTED: The layered control architecture and the social-credit correction
The real-name ID system, the camera/biometric mesh, the Alipay/WeChat financial layer, the e-CNY pilots, and the Supreme People’s Court blacklist with its automatic cross-platform penalties are documented. The correction — that no single unified national social-credit score is deployed — is itself an important documented accuracy point that distinguishes this account from popular exaggeration.
Sources: Human Rights Watch, China’s Algorithms of Repression (IJOP analysis), 2019. The Xinjiang Police Files, 2022. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Xinjiang assessment, 2022. Creemers, Rogier, scholarship on China’s social-credit systems.
The Mirror
The instructive value of the China case is structural. Both the Chinese and American surveillance systems run on private-sector hardware and software, lawfully procured or compelled; both substitute corporate data flows for what direct state seizure would face legal barriers to obtaining (in China, under data-security laws; in the United States, by purchasing from data brokers what the Fourth Amendment would forbid seizing); both rely more on blacklist enforcement than universal scoring (China’s court blacklist; the American No-Fly and watchlist systems); both use AI to fuse data into pattern-of-life profiles; both vary in intensity by jurisdiction; and — most importantly — in both, surveillance infrastructure built for one purpose has historically not been dismantled when the predicating threat passed. The architecture builds; it does not unbuild.
CONTESTED / OPEN QUESTION: The strength of the U.S.–China ‘mirror’
The structural parallels are documented and genuinely instructive, and the differences are real and significant — China’s system operates without independent courts, a free press, or political opposition, and at an intensity (mass internment) with no American equivalent. The ‘mirror’ framing is a useful analytical lens, not a claim that the systems are equivalent. Treating the parallel as identity rather than analogy overstates it; the judicial oversight, removal mechanisms, and political constraints differ in kind, not just degree. The lens is valuable precisely because it illuminates a real question — are the same incentives operating? — without asserting the answers are the same.
DOCUMENTED: China was built, not conquered — the emergent thesis
The documented history supports the source material’s own central claim: China’s present system emerged not from a coup or revolution but from forty years of foreign capital seeking returns, foreign manufacturers seeking lower costs, foreign universities and engineers seeking partnerships and interesting problems, a domestic technocratic class seeking efficiency, and a public broadly trading autonomy for prosperity — assisted by the same American institutions that now express alarm. This emergent account is well supported and is, notably, the opposite of a coordinated-conspiracy explanation.
Sources: Autor/Dorn/Hanson, China Shock papers. U.S. Entity List actions, 2019. Comparative surveillance scholarship.
The Israel Arc
Recognition, Alignment, and the USS Liberty
From President Truman’s recognition of Israel in 1948 — eleven minutes after its declaration, over Secretary Marshall’s objection — the United States moved over decades from cautious distance to deep strategic alignment. Substantial American arms transfers began under Kennedy (HAWK missiles, 1962) and expanded dramatically under Johnson (Patton tanks, Skyhawks, and the F-4 Phantom), displacing France as Israel’s primary supplier. One documented episode complicates the alliance narrative: on June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War, Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence ship in international waters, killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 171. Israel described it as mistaken identity and paid compensation; survivors and some U.S. officials disputed the official conclusion.
DOCUMENTED: The arms arc and the USS Liberty attack
The Truman recognition, the Kennedy-through-Johnson arms transformation, and the USS Liberty attack with its casualty figures and compensation are documented. That the attack remains the largest peacetime attack on U.S. forces by an allied state, and that its official ‘mistaken identity’ explanation is disputed by survivors and some officials, is also documented.
CONTESTED / OPEN QUESTION: The USS Liberty as deliberate
Whether the attack was deliberate or a tragic error remains genuinely contested. The official U.S. and Israeli position is mistaken identity; survivors and some former officials argue intent. The evidence does not definitively resolve the question. The documented facts — the attack, the casualties, the disputed explanation — should be distinguished from the unresolved question of intent.
Sources: Truman recognition records and Marshall’s objection. U.S.–Israel arms-transfer histories. USS Liberty inquiry records and survivor testimony.
Unit 8200 and the Technology Ecosystem
Israel developed one of the world’s leading ecosystems for surveillance, cyber, and dual-use biotechnology, and its single most important institution is not a company but Unit 8200 — the IDF’s signals-intelligence and cyber corps, the rough equivalent of the NSA. Universal conscription funnels Israel’s most technically capable eighteen-year-olds through 8200 and adjacent units (9900 for geospatial, Talpiot, Mamram), who then enter the civilian economy with elite skills and peer networks. The pipeline produced founders or senior leadership at Check Point, Palo Alto Networks, CyberArk, Wiz, SentinelOne, NSO Group, Cellebrite, Verint, Mobileye, and Waze, among many others. The 1993 government-seeded Yozma venture-capital program catalyzed the modern Israeli venture industry, and by the late 1990s Israel had the world’s second-highest venture investment per capita.
DOCUMENTED: Unit 8200 and the tech pipeline
The role of Unit 8200 and adjacent units as a talent pipeline into the Israeli technology sector, the specific firms founded by alumni, the Yozma program, and Israel’s venture-density ranking are documented in business and technology histories, including Senor and Singer’s Start-Up Nation. This is established fact, and the scale and concentration of the conscript-intelligence-to-private-tech pattern is distinctive to Israel.
The Surveillance Export Industry
Where Chinese firms built the cameras and computer vision, Israeli firms built the mobile, communications, and forensic-interception layer. NSO Group, founded in 2010 by former intelligence personnel, produces Pegasus, a mobile-device exploitation suite capable of zero-click compromise of iPhones and Android devices — full extraction of messages and location, and remote activation of microphone and camera. Sold to dozens of governments under licensing nominally restricted to serious crime and counterterrorism, Pegasus has been documented by Citizen Lab and Amnesty International being used against journalists, dissidents, lawyers, and political figures in Mexico, Saudi Arabia (including against associates of Jamal Khashoggi before his murder), Morocco, Hungary, Spain, and the UAE. NSO was added to the U.S. Entity List in November 2021. Cellebrite, founded in 1999, produces phone-extraction forensic tools used by law enforcement worldwide, including in the United States.
DOCUMENTED: NSO/Pegasus and the interception industry
NSO Group, Pegasus’s capabilities, its documented deployment against journalists and dissidents (per Citizen Lab and Amnesty International), the Khashoggi-associate targeting, the 2021 Entity List addition, and Cellebrite’s forensic tools are documented. The Israeli surveillance-export industry and its documented abuses are established.
CONTESTED / OPEN QUESTION: The U.S.–Israel–China ‘triangulated’ convergence
The U.S.–Israel security and technology relationship, and Israel’s separate technology and trade ties with China (which the U.S. has pressured Israel to limit), are documented. The framing of a deliberately ‘triangulated architecture’ in which these relationships are coordinated is the source material’s interpretive lens. The bilateral relationships are real; the integrated triangle is an analytical construct, not an established coordinated arrangement.
Sources: Senor, Dan, and Saul Singer. Start-Up Nation, 2009. Citizen Lab and Amnesty International investigations of Pegasus, 2018–2021. U.S. Entity List addition of NSO Group, November 2021.
x.com/infantrydort/status/20…