Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
BIGEurope
Allies have a vital chance to project credibility at this week’s NATO Summit in Türkiye. But is the trust already gone? In theory, the Alliance convenes in Ankara with solid foundations for joint action: significant global increases in defence budgets, the operationalization of Arctic security measures, ‘out of area’ cooperation in the Strait of Hormuz on the cards, and European Allies ready to play a greater role. On the surface, the so-called ‘NATO 3.0’ appears to be in the making. ⚠️ There’s just one problem: effective deterrence demands clarity, while the bonds of NATO feel less certain than ever. The Europeans and Canadians can no longer depend on constructive engagement from the United States – let alone solemn commitments on which the Alliance depends. On this side of the Atlantic, meanwhile, unanswered questions about Europe’s readiness – with or without US support – risk turning strategic ambiguity into dangerous doubt. With adversaries watching, this week’s summit must show NATO can rise above its internal frictions and show common resolve once again, argues BIG’s Claude-France Arnould. Acrimony, inconsistency and sycophancy are all signals of weakness which Atlantic security can ill afford. 🔗 Read Claude-France’s pre-summit take here: big-europe.eu/publications/2… #NATO #NATOSummit #Defence #Security
1
21
M_Simonyan
“It is clear that the heirs of the Third Reich are tormented by phantom pains from the military failures of their grandfathers and great-grandfathers. Their thirst for revenge gives them no peace,” Belarusian President Lukashenko said. “A serious factor of strategic deterrence, capable of cooling the hottest heads, has been the deployment in Belarus of the Oreshnik mobile missile system and tactical nuclear weapons.” “We are peaceful people, we do not want war, but we do not intend to bow our heads before the enemy.”
2
17
448
delhifileslive
Dr. Jagannath Nayak has officially assumed charge as the Director General of Missiles & Strategic Systems (DGMSS) at DRDO, marking an important leadership transition in one of India’s most critical defence research domains. An eminent scientist with extensive experience in missile technologies and strategic defence systems, Dr. Nayak took over the role with effect from July 1, 2026. The DGMSS division plays a vital role in advancing India’s indigenous missile capabilities, strengthening strategic deterrence, and driving innovation in defence technologies. Dr. Nayak’s appointment comes at a time when the country continues to prioritize self-reliance, technological excellence, and modernization of its defence ecosystem under the vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat. His leadership is expected to further accelerate research, development, and the successful execution of next-generation strategic programmes, reinforcing India’s position in advanced defence technology. The appointment reflects DRDO’s continued commitment to scientific excellence and national security through innovation and indigenous capability development. Stay connected with DelhiFiles.com for the latest updates on governance, defence, public administration, and policy developments across India. #DRDO #JagannathNayak #DGMSS #DefenceResearch #MissileTechnology #NationalSecurity #AtmanirbharBharat #Innovation #India #DelhiFiles #Governance #DefenceNews
50
Amanda retweeted
Austinescapee
Replying to @MAGAVoice
No accountability, no deterrence. It’s not rocket science.
1
6
84
sammyrodent
This is not acceptable behavior for any race. Where are the tough on crime policies and judges that hold these criminals accountable? Without deterrence you will never improve the situation
1
9
davebearpig1
Replying to @nonregemesse
Or just real slavery. Bring back cruel punishment as a deterrence
LogonZoon
Here’s the truth : capital punishment = human sacrifice. Human societies essentially claim the right to expiate outrages and appease the divine by sending the culprit to the dead, giving him a last meal, so he has strength for the crossing. The execution is an inherently sacral act. It is primitive, in the sense of primordial, essential and authentic. Hence, you can judge the extent of a society’s alienation by the suppression of capital punishment. Wherever we find no capital punishment, we also find dishonest, shallow, ideological, alienated ideas about justice as rehabilitation, abstract and alienated justice, as opposed to primordial phenomenological θεμις. Execution is not about deterrence : it is about the expiation of violations of θεμις, who is more primordial than father Zeus, the sovereign. Pre/fascist modernity - i.e. liberalism - remains in the essentially alienated ideological, dishonest, inauthentic understanding of justice. Only fascism transcends that alienation, synthesizing the primordial and the scientific, and restoring our honest right of outraged expiation in vengeance.
9
StewartEestis
Interesting how the US has pulled virtually all of its troops from Estonia, and the @USEmbTallinn hasn't so much as commented on it. No explanation, nothing. The whole point of deterrence is to have an actual deterrent.
2
63
praisegeorge
"It is better to be feared than to be liked." Machiavelli. When people know you will retaliate viciously, they respect you. The USA spends billions on its military. This is why their enemies don't mess with them. This is called deterrence. It protects you from lunatics.
283
harper_zli
Replying to @LeonHWolf
Maybe, but not very likely. Problem is that football rules rely very much on deterrence and, as you know, every sport, including primarily American sports, also have institution of suspension or at least financial punishment beyond the current game.
25
praisegeorge
Someone tried to harm you and you 'forgave' that person. Don't be an idiot Let there be swift punishment, severe consequences, and painful repercussions. Cause that person unforgettable pain. If you do nothing, idiots will target you for destruction. Consequences serve as deterrence to your enemies.
1
1
286
zjs888888882025
Replying to @nytimes
This is merely a routine nuclear deterrence measure by China against US. The US could respond in kind by test-launching a submarine-launched ballistic missile . If the US launch is also successful, it would prove that its nuclear deterrence capabilities remain intact.
11
john_balde12345
Replying to @DanBig9953
Whether long term undocumented immigrants who pay taxes and have families should be deported remains a central and highly contested debate in American politics, balancing economic and humanitarian argument against the enforcement of federal law. Arguments Against Deportation Economic Contributions Proponents of legal status highlights that undocumented workers feel crucial labor gaps in agriculture, construction, good hospitality while contributive billions in sales, property, and income taxes. Family Unity Opponents of deportation empathize with the severe psychological and financial trauma inflicted on families, particularly the millions of mixed status households containing US citizen children. Community Integration Advocates arguing that individuals residing in the country for decades are deeply embedded in local communities, churches, and civic organizations, math removal socially disruptive. Argument For Deportation Rule of Law Proponents of strict enforcement argue that answering all remaining in the country without authorization violates federal law, and Bailey to enforce these laws undermine the legal system. Fairness to Legal Immigrants Critics of legalization pathways contend that allowing undocumented immigrants to stay rewards unlawful behavior and is unfair to individuals waiting years in the legal immigration pipeline. Deterrence Supporters of deportation argue that consistent enforcement is necessary to deter future unauthorized border crossing and maintain national sovereignty. Recent public opinion polling demonstrates a significant divide on the issue, but consistently shows that support for a pathway to citizenship spikes dramatically when the focus shifts specifically to long-term undocumented residents who meet certain requirements. While general support for "mass deportation" fluctuates between 45% and 54% in general polling contexts, detailed surveys review a more nuanced public perspective when specific conditions, like a 10 to 20 year residency, are introduced. Pathway to Citizenship vs. Mass Deportation When polls present a direct choice between allowing long-term undocumented immigrants to earn legal status versus deporting them, Americans favor legalization by a clear margin: Support for Citizenship/Legal Status Polls tracked by Gallup and Pew Research Center find that 70% to nearly 80% of Americans favor giving long-term undocumented immigrants a chance to stay illegally or become citizens if they meet specific criteria (such as passing background checks or paying taxes). Support for General Deportation When framed broadly, General support for deporting all unauthorized immigrants sits lower, roughly between 35% and 47%, depending on the surveys phrasing. Evolving Sentiment on Enforcement Publix sentiment has shifted noticeably in response to real world enforcement actions; The "Too Much" Threshold A Pew Research Center survey indicates that 52% of us adults believe current enforcement efforts are doing "too much" to deport undocumented immigrants. Bipartisan Common Ground Even among those who favor stricter border control, a notable person supports a compromise. PBS NewsHour report highlighted that support for pathways to citizenship for long-term residents includes roughly 6 in 10 Republicans, alongside strong majorities of Democrats and Independents. Overlap in Belief Polling experts point out that these views are not always mutually exclusive, around 43% of people who State they support "mass deportation" in theory also agree that long-term residents who have deep roots and clean records should have a pathway to stay legally. I believe if you're undocumented immigrant who has been here 10 to 20 years and paid taxes,obeyed laws, American culture, and keep being a benefit to America give him the pathway for citizenship because they already contributed to this great nation by paying taxes and obeying the law besides illegally crossing the border.
5
BarkinBossMacro
Replying to @visionergeo
In the Indo-Pacific, missile tests are also political signals. Range, timing, and location matter because they speak directly to deterrence, alliance planning, and regional stability.
14
ConservaWonk
A sign that we need to prioritize our Pacific #deterrence posture & not remain distracted elsewhere in the world. #China
This is a major development as China has never before fired a ballistic missile from one of its nuclear submarines. While East Asian partners were renotified, it is not clear whether the Chinese let the US know in advance. China fires ballistic missile into Pacific nuclear-free zone ft.com/content/c52f0a98-2e6a… via @ft
2
35
chevordov
Replying to @Tsahkna
Summit of delivery” is the right phrase. Kyiv can offer a simple metric for it. Last night: 68 missiles, 351 drones, at least 13 dead in the capital. Deterrence that exists on paper did not intercept a single one. Estonia understands this without translation.
20
Obi_Kwa
BREAKING: Trump’s America is watching Nigeria’s 2027 elections closely! 🔥 US Congressman Riley Moore just dropped a bombshell — the Trump administration will be paying very close attention to how Nigeria conducts its 2027 general elections. This isn’t just talk; it comes with hints of legislation that could tie US security assistance and relations to credible polls and governance improvements. Why this is massive good news for Nigeria: In the 2023 elections, Peter Obi of the Labour Party won decisively in almost all major satellite/urban cities and areas where foreign observers were actively present (think parts of Lagos, Abuja/FCT where he took over 59% of votes, and other monitored zones). Where international eyes were on the ground, results reflected the people’s will far more transparently. This proves one thing: real scrutiny works — it reduces rigging, vote buying, and manipulation. More advantages if Trump’s team stays involved: • Stronger deterrence against electoral fraud INEC and politicians will think twice knowing the world’s most powerful country is watching. • International legitimacy A cleaner 2027 election could unlock better US-Nigeria relations, more investment, trade deals, and diaspora confidence. • Pressure for real reforms. This could force improvements in INEC processes, BVAS, IReV transparency, and security around polling units. • Economic & security boost . Credible elections often lead to stability, which attracts foreign direct investment and could ease conditions on aid/security support. • Hope for the masses. Nigerians tired of “same old same old” finally get a shot at elections that truly reflect their votes. This is the kind of external pressure that could finally make our democracy work for the people, not just the powerful. What do you think — will this monitoring actually change things in 2027? Drop your thoughts 👇 #Nigeria2027 #FreeFairElections #PeterObi
15