In a decent world this wouldn’t have to be said. Charlie Kirk was viciously, brutally murdered and Erika Kirk suffered an unimaginable loss. She deserves sympathy, respect, support and Christian love. No one with a shred of decency would target her for attack. No one with a shred of decency would platform someone who attacks her. No one with a molecule of benevolence and integrity would enable these attacks, including by listening to them and even entertaining the notion that these conspiracy theories are remotely credible. Shame on the whole lot of these cretins. I’ve had it up to my eyeballs seeing this over and over. Quit pretending this is behavior that decent people would tolerate. I hope they get their comeuppance.

I'm doing a one minute special today on who killed Charlie Kirk. You don't have to subscribe. You don't have to pay anything. You don't have wait 9 months. You don't have to attack a grieving widow and her children. - and you don't have to listen to laughable nonsense. See picture below. That concludes my one minute special on who killed Charlie Kirk. Thanks for watching.

When Charlie invited me to his office, he called me. @tylerbowyer and @AndrewKolvet can confirm this. If he thought I was a nut job, he wouldn’t have flown me out and hosted me at his office. @RCMaxw3ll was present in the building while I was there as well. He too can confirm. Here’s some texts I had with Charlie though in June of 2025… It’s just a fact he was worried about the Woke Reich and Islam at the time of his death. He was planning to do more to stop the spread of Islam in America. Then 2 weeks later, he was killed.

Bizarre moment as Biden is left behind on stage at the Obama Center opening, asking for his granddaughter. “Where is my granddaughter?”

That’s why the other wives were in summer attire.

🚨 EPSTEIN BOMBSHELL: Media and Dems LIED for YEARS trying to tie Trump to the pedo island creep. New details drop: Epstein hated Trump because Trump turned him in to the cops. No dirt found when Epstein went shopping for leverage. Handwritten notes offering “dirt” on Trump? Empty. Trump said he hadn’t spoken to the guy in 15 years and wasn’t a fan. Shocker, the guy who actually helped put eyes on Epstein gets smeared while real elites partied with him. Trump was right again. The left’s favorite conspiracy just blew up in their face.

Watch Candace Owens over the course of NINE MONTHS go from claiming Charlie Kirk was shot from BELOW, to then BEHIND, to then being 100% CERTAIN he was shot from the FRONT. NOW she's suggesting he may have actually been killed by an explosive microphone - which she dismissed back in Sept. Honestly, who knows what it'll be next month? There is no better IQ test than who takes Candace Owens seriously.

Gavin's own chief of staff just became the #1 witness against him in a probe that began under Biden. 🍿🍿🍿 Cry some more, Gavin.

Candace Owens has been telling her audience “we’re getting close” to cracking the Charlie Kirk assassination - for 200 days straight. She isn’t close. The case has already been solved.

Dana Loesch: “God has ordered His church to care for widows, that widows be included, so they are not isolated, to protect widows, to care for widows, to not persecute a widow in the most ungodly ways, because you're jealous that you are not the one controlling an organization that that widow's husband built.” @DLoesch live at WLS 2026

Ben Shapiro SLAMS Candace Owens and her minions for spreading lies about Erika Kirk. He believes that foreign operatives have used Candace Owens and other useful idiots to HIJACK what should’ve been a unifying moment for many Americans after Charlie was killed. And he’s right the constant attacks on Erika have been normalized. You see them all over social media. One of the largest dehumanization campaigns I’ve ever seen. And it’s all happening in a time where political violence has been normalized as well. So it’s obvious that the next step was always going to be someone trying to hurt Erika and others at TPUSA. I expect scum bags on the internet to do scummy things. But Candace Owens knows better. She understands the current political climate that we’re in. She knows the weight that her words carry. Therefore I have no choice but to believe that she wants to get someone hurt or killed.

Nobody has profiteered more off of Charlie's death than you have, Candace, and you share plenty of Charlie's private communications with you. But there are a few important differences: 1. You were not Charlie's wife. 2. Your messages tend to be from half a decade ago or more -- I wonder why! 3. You love referring to dates he went on and women he knew prior to Erika. There is very clearly no reason to do this except trying to humiliate Erika, and you were doing even before you started accusing her of helping murder Charlie. 4. You do all of this to profit yourself. Yeah, Turning Point needs to raise money. It does that because it actually does things. It puts on multiple conferences a year, it organizes campus events and faith events; TP Action employs literally hundreds of people for ballot chasing efforts in swing states. You've never done anything remotely comparable -- and you couldn't, because you have neither the talent nor the selflessness to do it. All you have is the narcissism to think that what Charlie built should have been handed over to you for free.

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision. That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there. Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level. Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline. The case proceeded anyway. The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence. Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict. An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status. Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

E. Jean Carroll, who herself claimed to be a massive Trump fan 15 years ago, appears deranged and sick. She lives with rodents, names her cat Vagina, and her dog Tits. She writes stories about what her dog taught her about sex, claimed on live TV that rape was sexy, and paints trees blue. Emails between her and her friend, who was also a key witness in the case, reveal her talking about her grand scheme to remove Trump from office. She was funded by a billionaire Democrat, benefited from changed laws specifically to prosecute Trump, and Carroll was the first person in the state to file under this new law. She won a case against Trump with zero evidence, no eyewitnesses, and in a trial where the judge refused to admit Trump's evidence against Carroll, showcasing a politically motivated prosecution. If you don't see an issue with that, you are part of the problem.

All of this… and the fact that E. Jean Carroll couldn’t even remember ***the year*** the alleged assault occurred. But @gtconway3d pushed her to sue anyway knowing the case was BS in an effort to take out Trump. Since then… Trump has been reelected. Carroll is being investigated for perjury. Conway is about to get smoked in his congressional race. Karma.

Lied about Reid Hoffman paying her legal expenses… Didn’t mention allegations in: 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Until 3 days after Trump announces re-election. Sick.

Now, now, Candace, both of us know you can’t be trusted to follow any kind of agreement or keep any kind of promise. You said Erika Kirk could get you to stop your endless harassment — a lie. You said you’d meet us any time, any place, then said you couldn’t come to Phoenix because of some bogus assassination plot involving the cartels (lol). Charlie was a far greater man than myself and he couldn’t fix you. Why would anybody trust you to change your behavior now?

Hey Candace! So here it is hun…. He wasn’t your husband, it’s not your widowhood, it’s not your grief journey, TPUSA is not your organization to worry about, Charlie’s legacy is not yours to carry on, Charlie’s children are not yours to care about. I know it’s hard for you to grasp, but this isn’t about you!

Truth. I love how her followers never ask any questions. Oh yes they were besties. Talked all the time but….. She unfollowed him in May 2024 She deleted all their pictures May 2024 She wasn’t invited to Amfest 24 or 25 She wasn’t invited to the woman’s summit she always had been at. She can’t show any texts after 2023 She wasn’t invited to his wedding. He never said anything bad about her or would debate her BECAUSE he didn’t want his family, him or TPUsa to become the target of what we have right now. He IGNORED her. She said herself that she blames Ben for her and Charlie’s separation. That right after she was fired from DW that Ben convinced Charlie to cut ties with her. But of course her followers don’t want to hear that. Reality isn’t something they want to hear.