Joined December 2009
4,976 Photos and videos
Pinned Post
High praise. When one gains the respect of (or criticism from) those whose opinion one has deep respect for, what else matters on social media? x.com/naval/status/187889210…
Replying to @aaryan_kakad
Same as I recommend to everyone. Read like a textbook, slowly, making sure that you understand each point. Less a book and more a school of philosophy. The Sovereign Child is an offshoot. Accompany with @ToKTeacher podcasts. The Beginning of Infinity a.co/d/aVrmpfE
18
12
303
113,622
Book author not backward in telling it like it is about the movie adaptation…on the DVD commentary 😂
Replying to @maxfolkmax
This Tom Clancy commentary for The Sum of All Fears sure does go some places
1
1
6
1,357
What "taking a theory seriously" is all about...and the consequences of not doing so. Especially in science:
2
16
1,546
Free Will, Consciousness and Knowledge Creation in under a minute:
2
9
1,052
Excerpt from x.com/ToKTeacher/status/2073…
Excerpts from and discussion of “The Four Strands” - Chapter 13 of "The Fabric of Reality" by @DavidDeutschOxf - *Part IV*. How The Four Strands hold together to provide a worldview and a new philosophy of optimism. Errors my own. @X version:
606
Music to any sensible person’s ears: eliminating all net zero legislation and “optimising for making energy as cheap and abundant as possible in this country.” Possibly more than anything else those two things could be like a rocket under a sluggish economy.
1
1
6
525
Notable omission: next to no mention of welfare and tax. After energy policy, reducing the cost burden of welfare on the taxpayer is crucial. Exactly 1:1 issues in Australia.
3
311
New civilisational existential doom prophecy dropped! (It’s (quote) “Spermageddon” - when the typical male’s sperm count falls to zero).
3
5
1,239
Of course the AI Doomers are saying we’ll all be dead long before that (the AI2027 people say it’s “mid 2030”). To paraphrase @DavidDeutschOxf we should put them in a sack and have them battle it out, and we talk to whoever wins to save us some time…
6
612
Excerpts from and discussion of “The Four Strands” - Chapter 13 of "The Fabric of Reality" by @DavidDeutschOxf - *Part IV*. How The Four Strands hold together to provide a worldview and a new philosophy of optimism. Errors my own. @X version:
1
4
9
2,342
I guess many who went close to apoplectic in recent times because Tyson "went woke" will nevertheless be fine with this. In fact they'll revel in the absurdity of "reality isn't really real" AND also DMT gives us direct access to it, without ever caring about the contradiction:
2
1
11
1,537
Brett Hall reposted
Indeed worth thinking about these ideas on the founding of the United states of America. It's clear to me the founders took the best political and moral theories of the time seriously, along with institutions of criticism, ie checks and balances. Recipe for rapid progress.
Excerpts from and discussion of “The Four Strands” - Chapter 13 of "The Fabric of Reality" by @DavidDeutschOxf - *Part IV*. How The Four Strands hold together to provide a worldview and provide an optimistic worldview. Errors my own. youtu.be/-5gk5KMuMgk?si=hM3Z…
2
3
1,090
Excerpts from and discussion of “The Four Strands” - Chapter 13 of "The Fabric of Reality" by @DavidDeutschOxf - *Part IV*. How The Four Strands hold together to provide a worldview and provide an optimistic worldview. Errors my own. youtu.be/-5gk5KMuMgk?si=hM3Z…
2
1
18
57,726
Also serves as a gift to my American friends this July 4th for the 250th birthday of that Great Nation, given it’s largely about the significance of creativity and the individual. There is no place on Earth that presently better fosters both so they flourish; optimism embodied.
2
2
22
728
You've probably heard this before, but it's always worth repeating. Something extremely cool about the "Star-spangled Banner," the American national anthem, is that it asks a question, and it's the question at the heart of everything in the American worldview. "Oh, say, can you see By the dawn's early light What so proudly we hailed At the twilight's last gleaming..." So the anthem begins with a question and a scene. One man, a patriot, is asking another man, another patriot, "can you see it?" at sunrise after a long, dangerous night. The "it" in question is going to be revealed to be the flag, our "star-spangled banner," which they had last fully recognized and honored as the sun set, daylight failed, and night crept over them the evening before. Can you see it? Say! Can you see it?! IS IT STILL THERE?! "Whose broad stripes and bright stars Through the perilous fight O'er the ramparts we watched Were so gallantly streaming..." Here we find that the "it" is in fact the flag, our star-spangled banner, and we learn why the question is being asked. The flag is described as having flown and streamed gallantly over ramparts of war through a perilous fight. All could have been lost. The flag, and even the fledgling country for which it stands, one nation under God and indivisible. Say! Can you see it? Now that the light is back? IS IT STILL THERE?! "--And the rockets' red glare, The bombs bursting in air, Gave proof through the night That our flag was still there!--" They could see it through the battle in the light of the rockets and bombs that threatened them, here and there in quick glimpses. But it was still there throughout! But now? At dawn? Say! Can you see? IS IT STILL THERE?! "Oh, say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave O'er the land of the free And the home of the brave?" The urgency is palpable with every refrain. They have to know. It's the first thing they must know as the sun begins to light the sky, even before it rises. IS IT STILL THERE?! Say! Say!! Can you see? Can you see it?! At the heart of every American beats the fundamental truth and reality that what we have here is precious, that it's worth fighting for, to the death if necessary, and that it's fragile. That at any moment it can be lost. That we have to remember to look for it because last night might have been the night in which it failed. Every day, every year, every generation. The American fight for freedom, to live in self-governance within ordered liberty, is ongoing and never-ending. The price of the land of the free is that it must be the home of the brave. We have to defend it, defend it, and defend it again, against all enemies foreign and domestic, because what we have is amazing, rare, fragile, and worth every cent of treasure, every drop of blood, and every risk to our sacred honor to protect it. Our anthem is not a declaration. It is not a proclamation. It is not a statement. It is a question. Every time we sing our wholly unique national anthem, we as American ask the question again. IS IT STILL THERE?! Are we still America? Does that star-spangled banner yet wave? Because it's a question, the answer is not known. It is not a guarantee. It cannot be taken for granted and isn't. And what an honor to ask and take up our part in the story, in the American Experiment, in the greatest country the world has ever known. For tonight, the last night of our first 250 years, as the sun gave way to twilight's last gleaming and darkness overtook our land once again, the answer was still yes. We can see it even tonight in the red glare of rockets, with small bombs bursting in air, fill the sky with the noble tribute of fireworks once again. And we all ask ourselves, will it still be flying at dawn? This is what it means to be an American. Happy 250th, America! Now for many happy returns! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
309
2,178
8,114
322,732
A misleading claim: yes. But imagine something like it were true: reducing or eliminating foreign aid causes deaths. This is an instance of the "concentrated losses, dispersed gains" - argument for free trade (we report local business closures, not dispersed wealth created).
518,428 children have died preventable deaths in the year since Musk dismantled USAID, saying, “Time for it to die.” motherjones.com/politics/202…
4
1
14
2,113
That is: if all one cares for is "number of lives lost or affected" we can always point to the "concentrated losses" that show up in (often at times spurious) news stories. But no one reports on the *more* lives saved/helped by the *dispersed gains* resulting from the savings.
1
10
683