Grok did not agree with your "the whole plot" conspiracy theory. You said "thats exactly it you just proved my point the whole plot is that they want in but create studies to fund against it as well they want in cheap too so what better way than to wreak havoc and get your gov buddies involved" Grok said: "Direct funding of anti-cannabis studies by Big Tobacco is not prominently documented in available sources. Tobacco firms have a notorious history of shaping science to downplay risks of their products and have funded nicotine-related research, but recent records focus more on their own harm-reduction products (e.g., e-cigarettes, heated tobacco) rather than cannabis opposition. Historical drug policy overlaps (e.g., broader "Reefer Madness" era efforts) involved multiple industries, but specific tobacco-to-anti-cannabis funding ties appear weaker or indirect compared to pharma and alcohol"