Joined August 2022
221 Photos and videos
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
I’d be thrilled to to tell you but there is a problem with naming people who are then know to and put under pressure by state reps. It’s incredibly frustrating but, what’s important is that we can argue this confidently - that Scotland cannot secede and does not require to obtain the agreement of the British state for recognition of its continuing sovereignty.
4
20
63
722
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
No, you read a book, on the theory of colonialism. But before you ever do, or even need to do, consider its purpose: resource extraction. Now consider the nature of national resources; people, and the fruits of the earth. Do you imagine the coloniser exploits one without the other? The colonised are the primary tool of colonial proliferation, put to a purpose like grains of rice on the squares of a chessboard; first one, then two, then four, then eight....
11
27
910
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @ScotNational
The English colonial state telling the colonised Scots they must remain colonised. Spent the whole week at the UN exposing Scotland's case as an English colony & decolonisation is more than ever the way! Liberation happens with the support of the international community & international law not by asking the English colonial state for permission. The international community is starting to see the truth about Scotland's constitutional, colonial status.
9
103
256
4,816
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @ScotExpress
An official independence event denied three times now by the UK government in 5 months. Where's your Section 30 strategy now, @JohnSwinney ? Your Anglo-Brit domestic "legal" route to independence? That legal route is, just as we say, and just as your panel of experts join together in a curious show of unanimity to deny, an international one, confirmed to us as valid last week by a world class international jurist. The SNP like the UK government are heading for a head-on collision with a mountain; the mountain of truth and of international law. There IS no valid union; no legitimate UK sovereignty in Scotland; only the annexation of a sovereign state dressed up as such in what, on the most cursory of examinations, can be readily identified as a crass legal fiction.
5
70
96
1,340
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Whether you like it or not the term colony is a legal definition and not an aggregate of characteristics you or others decide to agree on. Whether you like it or not without an operative treaty - without an executed partnership agreement- the only possible legal definition of Scotland’s status is dependency or colony. History written by dissenters from the occupation narrative was still being challenged when last I looked. And you surely don’t mean to suggest that the courts of an accused state are competent to determine its guilt or otherwise in a question of purely international law - an accusation of colonialism? But I’m sure you will be delighted to hear that we are steadily moving the question to the proper forum, that of international law and you may be interested to know that a growing number of influential, international jurists agree with our argument: Scotland cannot ‘separate’ from a state it never joined, cannot separate from the only state which survived the ‘union’, England. It can only remove a longstanding, unlawful foreign subjugation.
Whether you like it or not Scotland is not and has never been a colony . History proves it - the courts have ruled on it. This colony story is separatist nonsense !
13
128
229
5,152
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Today at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva @ungeneva, I met Prof. Dapo Akande @DapoAkandeLaw Oxford Professor of Public International Law @UniofOxford, Member of the UN International Law Commission where he was officially nominated by the UK state (i.e. the English colonial state). He is now the official English colonial state candidate for the International Court of Justice @CIJ_ICJ. I wished him good luck in defending the English colonial state’s annexation of Scotland against Scotland and Liberation Scotland, Scotland's liberation movement, at the ICJ, an institution fully established and funded by Scottish industrialist Andrew Carnegie. Interestingly, he was talking about international treaties and the ILC. Unfortunately, there was no time to ask him how an international treaty like the 1706-1707 Treaty of Union between sovereign and independent Scotland and England should be audited and reviewed since it is now demonstrated by Liberation Scotland with Professor Robert Black King's Counsel that it was annexation of Scotland by the English colonial state and that it was actually never implemented by England at all and was just one of the over 200 colonial treaties England has imposed on colonised people around the world to plunder them and destroy their identity. Under international jurisprudence (including principles later codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties), any international agreement obtained through coercion, political bribery, or military duress is invalid. I'm sure we'll have plenty more occasions to see Prof. Dapo Akande as a representative of the English colonial state on the international stage for international law. @un @UN_HRC @UNHumanRights
13
80
115
2,960
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @KarenAllan38871
Scots participated in England's Empire, yes - well underway already in 1707. Daniel Defoe even sold to the English their utility as well-educated and valorous human capital, as a positive reason for making the ancient state of Scotland an 'offer' of 'Union' it could not refuse. At least not without invasion. Colonised states have NO agency; people, however have, and are also susceptible to both coercion and reward. Individuals of other colonised peoples were similarly swept up by the coloniser - Irish and Indian in particular - in one regard or another, from the pampered and assimilated elites down to the lumpen masses powerless to resist colonial exile and exploitation. Human capital for much of Scotland's 300 years of subjugation was the focus on English extraction, and was, as Defoe predicted, hugely enriching for the coloniser. Is there another point you are trying to make, because this is the one you are in fact illustrating.
3
26
38
861
"The call to 'acknowledge Scotland’s role in empire' exemplifies another colonial manoeuvre. The move appears as honesty but functions as displacement. Sovereignty was stolen by force & colonial treaty. Yet, the colonised are asked to confess complicity, transforming victims into accomplices & colonisers into absolved figures. Such rhetorical inversion is central to coloniality." Chris Thomson brings his immersive experience in the post-colonial world to teach fellow Scots that the time for tolerating trite and condescending treatment of Scotland as little more than an appurtenance and embellishment of English colonial projection is over. Writers on the subject from now on are going to have to do better than Gethins' advocacy for Scottish independence, apparently steeped in reasons why Scotland should never be independent. You could easily conclude that a political overhaul in Scottish nationalist politics is overdue, when this kind of political thought sets the boundaries of its ambitions.
The Polite Mask of Colonialism: Stephen Gethins’ Book Nation to Nation: Scotland’s Place in the World as a Manual of Submission for a Colonised Scotland Stephen Gethins’ Nation to Nation: Scotland’s Place in the World, first published in 2021 and revised in 2022 (notably given the Ukraine war), emerges at a moment when Scotland’s struggle for sovereignty is intensifying both within domestic politics & in international consciousness, notably given Scotland's decolonization from the English coloniser started through @UN mechanisms. The book presents itself as a sober reflection on Scotland’s global role under devolution. In practice, the text functions as a colonial instrument that teaches the colonised how to manage subordination with civility. The rhetoric of modesty, the celebration of culture as compensation, the nice words for the colonial Foreign Office of England which calls Scots/Scotland "English/England" around the world in foreign languages, the invocation of diaspora as "soft power" form part of a pedagogical structure through which obedience is normalised & ambition prohibited. Despite what the polite British MP Gethins from the SNP thinks or in fact doesn't think at all given his devolutionist unionism, Scotland is a colony of England. Culture as compensation for sovereignty The book displaces sovereignty with culture. Diaspora networks, Enlightenment prestige, higher education exports are presented as Scotland’s great contributions to the world. (No mention that Scottish universities are under English colonial occupation). This manoeuvre is consistent with colonial discourse, which habitually substitutes cultural pride for political independence. Colonised peoples are encouraged to celebrate their songs, festivals, polite intellectual achievements while sovereignty remains confiscated. Diaspora success is presented as national achievement even when rooted in exile. Anyway, the Foreign Office (FCDO) of England, the foreign policy arm of the English coloniser, has made sure Scotland's powerful diaspora focuses on London & is constantly lied to through England's fictional union, veiling Scotland's colonial condition. Enlightenment legacies are paraded while the fundamental fact of the colonial criminal 1707 Union is suppressed. Such substitution belongs to the structure of coloniality where prestige in culture is permitted to obscure captivity in politics. Controlled visibility & the theatre of harmlessness The book highlights Burns Suppers abroad & Scotland Houses in Europe. These are spectacles of controlled visibility, authorised because they are harmless. Burns can be celebrated, tartan can be displayed, & whisky & salmon can be promoted, as long as sovereignty is absent. To confuse this visibility with agency is to mistake spectacle for power. These are colonial practices where festivals & costumes are permitted to the colonised, provided they reinforce subordination rather than threatened it. Scotland has no foreign policy (strategy) since it's an English colony. The displacement of guilt The call to “acknowledge Scotland’s role in empire” exemplifies another colonial manoeuvre. The move appears as honesty but functions as displacement. Sovereignty was stolen by force & colonial treaty. Yet, the colonised are asked to confess complicity, transforming victims into accomplices & colonisers into absolved figures. Such rhetorical inversion is central to coloniality: it redistributes guilt away from empire while placing the burden upon the dominated. The gesture mirrors global examples where collaboration by elites was weaponised to deny the reality of colonisation, as in Algeria, South Africa or Goa. @CIJ_ICJ @UN @UN_HRC @EU_Commission @Europarl_EN @eu_eeas @coe @EURightsAgency @francediplo @FranceintheUK @franceintheus @cgfEdimbourg @UNGeneva @GermanyDiplo @bundeskanzler @NorwayMFA @dfatirl @PresidentIRL @antonioguterres @UNHumanRights
2
61
85
2,173
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @J4m35c4mpb3ll
Nobody denies India was a colony and yet,
3
30
45
1,740
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @Telegraph
Since Scotland's decolonisation has started via the UN against the English colonial state, this propaganda media is lying as usual. As now called in the UN system, Scotland is an English colony. The English colonial state has illegally annexed and colonised Scotland. Annexation is demonstrated by Scotland's liberation movement Liberation Scotland with Robert Black King's Counsel, Scotland's leading law authority. Scotland is not a voluntary partner in any union. Scotland was not a partner or participant in the English empire. Certain Scots participated as colonised people serving the colonial power like it happened in all English colonies: Irish, Indians, Scots, etc. There were no Scots in the East India Company before Scotland's annexation. The East India Company was a fully ENGLISH company. Fully English in English law. Never Scottish. Currently at the UN in Geneva, I can testify that the international community is discovering the reality of the constitutional, colonial, annexed situation of Scotland as an English colony of the English colonial state and everyone is taking this very seriously. Applying international law, Scotland is an English colony whether you like it or not and the English colonial state has no say about this. It is a matter for the international community to judge.
25
53
128
4,880
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
The Saltire, Europe's oldest flag, the flag of the sovereign nation of Scotland still under illegal English occupation is visible at the United Nations Office in Geneva (UNOG) cafeteria. Soon a huge Saltire will be present in all UN offices & in Scottish embassies globally.
71
145
393
9,108
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @JohnSwinney
And you are legitimising the annexation of that beautiful Crown, (institutionally beautiful because it’s legal identity is not the monarch but the Community of the Realm, the people), by the feudal, privilege based English Crown by not just acquiescing but paying homage to a ceremony of colonial capture. Utterly heartbreaking to see.
4
57
113
1,458
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Swinney's ridiculous fealty stunt with the physical Scottish crown is an exercise in grovelling, colonial collaboration. "a kingdom is the territorial jurisdiction of a crown... Without a single and united crown there is no unitary United Kingdom of Great Britain. No single and united Crown of Great Britain was ever created..." Sara Salyers @LiberationScot @Broonpot @ScotSalvo @SalvoHighlands @SSRG2021 @DavidDhenry @SSalyers2 @PAlanMcMahon @thomsonchris Listen Again to full presenation to UN in Geneva Part 1 🎥 youtu.be/bhfhIUi4SDc?si=43Yl…
Good morning from Edinburgh Castle. It’s a very unusual start to my day…
4
57
66
3,117
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
Replying to @SSalyers2
When the UK takes a controversial foreign policy stance, Gaza Lebanon Iran and Sudan etc. International observers often say. Britain supports X. The British Government has done Y. But Scotland’s public opinion and its political leadership are not in agreement with the English Westminster controlled government. They opposed it criticised it Are morally distinct from it So the point is. It is unfair to portray Scotland as aligned with Westminster’s decisions when Scotland’s public and political stance is different. The conflation Westminster speaks for Scotland is false. 🤔☮️⚖️🌎🤞🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
17
34
1,628
Sara Salyers on this: Everything about what we are saying and doing is controversial for a people contained in a colonial bubble and fed imperial propaganda until they cannot think outside those tropes. They have no mental tools with which to identify the precise character of the dying English empire from its past record and present crimes, separate themselves and their own history from the story it forced on them, recognise our colonised condition, analyse present dynamics where England hopes to rise on the coattails of the new colonial power. Chronically subjected to an induced blindness of imperial propaganda, they can't make the simple, logical jump to the understanding that our only hope for freedom in a law abiding world is the triumph of a global alliance against the rising monster that is the US/NATO axis.
Replying to @LiberationScot
FFS leave this stuff to others and concentrate on Scotland.🙄
1
35
48
1,527
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
“The global south sees NATO as an aggressive organisation with blood on its hands, and Mark Rutte knows it.” This is true. It is seen as the military arm of the new colonialism - and legitimately so. The new colonials are busy adding territories to their control. They will not tolerate any more decolonisation. They will not tolerate a weakened U.K. ally or risk a potential ‘domino effect’ through Scottish independence or risk that in an independent and democratic Scotland, the people might vote to take the nuclear targets (Faslane and now Rosyth), off their back, join the group of small neutral countries of the world, cease to be a US weapons carrier and deprive NATO of a strategic point of geographic control. Recognition of Scotland’s right to self determination and of its independence once declared, rests on the support of roughly 120 states which see NATO as a blood soaked aggressor. So if we want independence it’s time to rethink old models and ideas. But a reminder: if nothing changes in terms of political leadership at home, if the gaslit, captured, self-satisfied Scottish political establishment continues to believe and peddle the transparent lies and legal abuses of the British state, if it continues to sell out to the new corporate feudalism and to ignore the rights Scots are entitled to under international law right now - not just after independence - we’re pretty much stuffed.
After prancing around the Oval Office and embarrassing Europe with his fealty to Trump, a journalist asked Mark Rutte if NATO is a ‘defensive organisation’, how were its wars on Libya and Iraq defensive wars? Mark Rutte dodged the question and refused to comment. A good thing about Mark Rutte is that he perfectly encapsulates exactly what NATO is: An organisation built on Western hypocrisy and double standards, and Europe’s total humiliating submission to Washington. The global south sees NATO as an aggressive organisation with blood on its hands, and Mark Rutte knows it.
9
70
71
2,001
👇👇👇👇
This is what they do. They are terrified of the truth so they run around trying to get it blocked, hidden, deplatformed or censored in every way possible. (Liberation Scotland has had similar experience though at a lower committee level. So we can now count itself alongside the many other ‘cancelled’ voices for justice.) Meanwhile another great mind switches from talking about the British to the English empire recognising that it is from England and England alone that this horror story was born and inflicted on the world and that it still has not woke. up to the end of its imperial impunity and entitlement.
7
14
427
Liberation Scotland Committee reposted
This is what they do. They are terrified of the truth so they run around trying to get it blocked, hidden, deplatformed or censored in every way possible. (Liberation Scotland has had similar experience though at a lower committee level. So we can now count itself alongside the many other ‘cancelled’ voices for justice.) Meanwhile another great mind switches from talking about the British to the English empire recognising that it is from England and England alone that this horror story was born and inflicted on the world and that it still has not woke. up to the end of its imperial impunity and entitlement.
Replying to @SSalyers2
I like this explanation, from Mr Sachs...
8
139
199
4,305
If you've ever wondered how the end of the Cold War and the West's decisive ideological defeat of the Soviet Union immediately led to a preternatural demonisation of the Russian Federation - a country nevertheless desperate to emulate the economic machinery of the United States and to find a harmonious new political and cultural coexistence with Western Europe - here is the little-known explanation. Pascal Lottaz of Neutrality Studies @PLottaz talks to Alexander Mercouris @AMercoris about the 19th-century French and English origins of a politically fuelled fear and hatred of Tsarist Russia as it began to recover and strengthen after the Napoleonic Wars - and about the never-ending demonisation of Russia and Russians ever since. Though it shares religious and cultural values with the West, and its western heartland is ethnically indistinguishable, Russia remains feared and despised in Europe to the point of madness - a madness that presents a serious risk of pitching the continent into war, with Germany at its heart, and with all the attendant horrors that country brought to Russia in the 1940s, and perhaps some cataclysmic ones for all concerned, on top. Add to this the hard fact that the United States has fully outsourced this conflict while refashioning NATO into a new, diluted relationship with Europe. To expect it today to step back in to save these countries in a conventional war, as it did in 1917 and 1941, is pure folly. The minds of Merz, Macron, Starmer, and now, to all indications Burnham, are to be wondered at. Mercouris finishes his talk with the surprising story that Ian Fleming - whose novels, notably From Russia with Love, John F. Kennedy's favourite novel, harshly portrayed the Russians in every respect - expressed genuine regret for the picture he had established of that country and its people. Yet he could not publicly say so without undermining the book's immense success. Fleming finished his days, says Mercouris, as an admirer of Fidel Castro's Cuba. I think we can take it from the nephew of Melina Mercouri that this is the truth. youtube.com/watch?v=Vf85Vvu1…
2
17
25
709