Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
GoonerEclipse
Replying to @IFLTV @ConorNigel
Spurs
223zzzzzzzu
Replying to @KariGotNext
Spurs vs Suns Clippers Vs Thunder Hornets Vs Pistons Philly Vs Celtics Come back when I’m right
barfootio1
Replying to @anthonypaphitis
Ignore everything he says. He never wants agrees with a controversial decision being wrong against Spurs. Can’t find one
joresokoreAV
Replying to @NFFC_CHRIS_
Spurs are just retarded Gallagher is a 10-15 mill player haha
2
EvoJonez
Celtics v Cavs Thunder v Spurs
THE BRACKET IS SET 🍿
NCspider73
Replying to @ScottPresler
Another dude with bone spurs?
1
restore_expat
@DazN88 I have a dilemma - Like Noah's animals going in 2 x 2 I follow Hammers, Gooners and Spurs - you'll be a third so, if you follow me first, I'll do the gentlemanly think and not only follow you back but also @englandthennow thus keeping my conscience clear 😁
1
HarrisChri99199
Replying to @RokerReport
We’re no where near good enough, no Spurs fan can dispute that, but the Premier League is a league of fine margins in many games one goal is decisive. So dreadful officiating when things aren’t going well just compounds the situation. Brobbey should have seen yellow for that very first tackle early on Romero it was reckless and unnecessary. The incident on Porro would then have been a second yellow. The push on Romero was unnecessary he wasn’t getting the ball and injured two players quite badly. How was that not a yellow as two players injured? Son got sent off against Everton when VAR saw the extent of the injury he’d caused it went from yellow to Red after review. Brobbey should have had a yellow based on the injuries alone there was no need to push Romero
5
boohoo7644
2015: Celtics (no KG or Pierce🗑), Bulls (Rose, Butler), Hawks (Jeff Teague💩), Warriors 2014: Bobcats (Kemba Walker😂), Nets (washed up💩 Pierce, Garnett, Joe Johnson), Pacers (PG13), lost to Spurs in Finals 2017: Pacers (Paul George), Raptors (DeRozan), Celtics only Jaylen💩
2
JimJones1425
That’s what ALL Spurs fans should boycott Sky. Get a fire stick.
What this season has shown us is how much influence Sky Sports have to manipulate fan opinions & the outcome of football matches. Selective replays, promoting “expert” opinions to whatever they want fans to believe, placing blame to suit agenda’s, it’s scary the power they have.
4
Blaugrana11I
Replying to @PSGINT_
WTF SPURS
10
nick_elt
These guys pissing off from chelsea would be 1,000,000x better than arsenal bottling the league or spurs going down. With these guys in charge im jealous of spurs tbh. Despise our owners.
🚨🔵 Chelsea chiefs handed themselves an 80% pay rise despite the club recording significant losses. “Key management personnel” earned £10.59M in 2024/25, up from £5.89M the previous year. Directors’ pay also rose from £2.18M to £3.49M. (@DanKing_1974 via @TheSunFootball) #CFC
9
Camberwell55321
Replying to @MarvaKreel
I don’t think Everton got the treatment from @FA_PGMOL that Spurs are getting this season. Fully admit we are shit. But being treated differently to everyone else because our centre back is Argentinian and has a rep definitely doesn’t help.
12
thompamoo
Replying to @The__Farmster
Ffs are you for real , do you think Spurs are going to get 13 more points than us in 6 games , the faceless fan base on here are so embarrassing
6
SzpukyJ
Replying to @StanCollymore
Probably only need 38. Spurs won’t get more than 7 points, not win this year so how are they going to do 3 in 6?
4
JimothyShondell
Dont get me wrong, I hope you minimum stay above Spurs for the rest of the season, but there's still a lot of football left to play. Looking good for you, but last night doesn't confirm anything.
8
simpson_liz
Major controversial decisions against Spurs (2025–26) 1. Fulham (A) – Harry Wilson goal allowed •Incident: Fulham’s goal stood despite a shove by Raúl Jiménez on Radu Drăgușin in the build-up. •Why controversial: •Very similar contact to a Spurs goal ruled out in another match. •Spurs highlighted inconsistency in physical contact decisions. •Outcome: Goal stood → Spurs lost 2–1. •Aftermath: Club formally complained to PGMOL. ⸻ 2. Arsenal (H) – Kolo Muani goal disallowed •Incident: Randal Kolo Muani’s goal ruled out for a push on Gabriel. •Why controversial: •Compared directly to the Fulham incident where a stronger push was allowed. •Outcome: Goal disallowed → big swing in derby match. ⸻ 3. Sunderland (A) – Brobbey avoids red card •Incident: Brian Brobbey elbowed Pedro Porro. •Decision: Only a yellow card given. •Why controversial: •Spurs fans argued similar challenges (especially by Cristian Romero) usually get reds. •Outcome: Player stayed on; Spurs lost 1–0. ⸻ 4. Sunderland (A) – second yellow not given •Incident: Brobbey also avoided a second booking for another challenge. •Why controversial: •Referee criticised for failing to dismiss him despite multiple offences. •Outcome: Sunderland kept 11 men. ⸻ 5. Sunderland (A) – penalty appeal rejected •Incident: Spurs had a “strong” penalty appeal turned down. •Why controversial: •VAR did not intervene despite clear appeals. •Outcome: No penalty awarded. FEEL FREE TO ADD MORE AS WE ALL KNOW THE LIST GOES ON… COYS
14
boohoo7644
Thats what ive been looking at, he had the easiest Finals runs. In 2007: Gilbert Arenas🗑, Jason Kidd, Chancey Billups💩, then Spurs in Finals 2016: Pistons (Andre Drummond), Hawks (Jeff Teague 🤣, Al Horford), Raptors (DeRozan, Kyle Lowry💩), Warriors
1
5
AE_mi5
Love watch list for the offs: wolves hawks hate watch list: spurs nuggets okc
2
Reality_Rob
Replying to @IDRV_MUFC
I agree, if it wasn’t for the 150m per year and the fear of losing our best players, I’d happily play in championship every year with no VAR! I’ll let Spurs do that though instead 😂
1
8